Nirvana fallacy : Différence entre versions

De WikiUpLib
Aller à : navigation, rechercher
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
  
 +
<html>
 +
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style "
 +
addthis:url="http://uplib.fr/wiki/The_2015_Catalan_election_is_a_plebiscite"
 +
addthis:title="In the end the Catalan election is indeed (nearly) a de facto plebiscite, Par David Forniès
 +
- via @uplib">
 +
</html>
 +
<addthis />
  
−
{{Use mdy dates|date=April 2012}}
 
−
The '''nirvana fallacy''' is a name given to the [[informal fallacy]] of comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives.<ref name=nemsetz/> It can also refer to the tendency to assume that there is a perfect solution to a particular problem. A closely related concept is the '''perfect solution fallacy'''.
 
  
−
By creating a [[false dichotomy]] that presents one option which is obviously advantageous—while at the same time being completely implausible—a person using the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. Under this fallacy, the choice is not between real world solutions; it is, rather, a choice between one realistic achievable possibility and another unrealistic solution that could in some way be "better".
+
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy
 +
 
 +
Encore un article de http://en.wikipedia.org sans équivalent dans http://fr.wikipedia.org
  
−
==History==
+
Epinglé ici en tant qu'outil classique de rhétorique gauchiste.
−
In ''[[s:fr:La Bégueule|La Bégueule]]'' (1772), [[Voltaire]] wrote ''Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien'', which is often translated as "The [[perfect is the enemy of the good]]" (literally: "The best is the enemy of the good").{{cn|reason=Please cite a source for these translations.|date=March 2015}}
 
  
−
The nirvana fallacy was given its name by economist [[Harold Demsetz]] in 1969,<ref name="Leeson07">{{cite web|url=http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/08/06/peter-t-leeson/anarchy-unbound-or-why-self-governance-works-better-than-you-think/|title=Anarchy unbound, or: why self-governance works better than you think|last=Leeson|first=Peter T.|date=2007-08-06|work=Cato Unbound|publisher=[[Cato Institute]]|accessdate=2009-07-01}}</ref><ref name="Shapiro07">{{cite book|last=Shapiro|first=Daniel|title=Is the welfare state justified?|publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]]|location=New York|year=2007|pages=4|isbn=0-521-86065-2|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ei-1kg2TSwEC&pg=RA1-PA4&lpg=RA1-PA4&dq=nirvana+fallacy#PRA1-PA4,M1}}</ref> who said:<ref name=nemsetz>H. Demsetz, "Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint", ''Journal of Law and Economics'' 12 (April 1969): 1, quoted in {{cite book |title=Competition and Entrepreneurship |last=Kirzner |first=Israel M. |isbn=0-226-43776-0 |year=1978|page=231}}</ref><br>
+
Aucune amélioration politique bottom-up n'est recevable puisqu'elle sera infiniment inférieure à la solution parfaite/nirvanesque top-down construite par l'état parfait/nirvanesque et ses agents parfaits/nirvanesques.
−
{{quote|The view that now pervades much public policy economics implicitly presents the relevant choice as between an ideal norm and an existing "imperfect" institutional arrangement. This ''[[nirvana]]'' approach differs considerably from a ''comparative institution'' approach in which the relevant choice is between alternative real institutional arrangements.}}
 
  
−
== Perfect solution fallacy ==
+
<i>«Tout dans l'état, rien contre l'état, rien en dehors de l'état.»</i>
−
{{Unreferenced section|date=March 2015}}
+
- Mussolini, discours à la ch des députés, 26 mai 1927 [[fascisme]]
  
−
The perfect solution fallacy is a related informal fallacy that occurs when an argument assumes that a perfect solution exists or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented. This is an example of [[black and white thinking]], in which a person fails to see the complex interplay between multiple component elements of a situation or problem, and, as a result, reduces complex problems to a pair of binary extremes.
+
<br>
  
−
It is common for arguments which commit this fallacy to omit any specifics about exactly how, or how badly, a proposed solution is claimed to fall short of acceptability, expressing the rejection only in vague terms. Alternatively, it may be combined with the fallacy of [[misleading vividness]], when a specific example of a solution's failure is described in emotionally powerful detail but base rates are ignored (see [[availability heuristic]]).
+
==Le début de l'article==
  
−
The fallacy is a type of [[false dilemma]].
+
The '''nirvana fallacy''' is a name given to the [[informal fallacy]] of comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives. It can also refer to the tendency to assume that there is a perfect solution to a particular problem. A closely related concept is the '''perfect solution fallacy'''.
  
−
=== Examples ===
+
By creating a [[false dichotomy]] that presents one option which is obviously advantageous—while at the same time being completely implausible—a person using the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. Under this fallacy, the choice is not between real world solutions; it is, rather, a choice between one realistic achievable possibility and another unrealistic solution that could in some way be "better".
  
−
;Posit (fallacious)
+
<br>
−
: These anti-[[drunk driving]] ad campaigns are not going to work. People are still going to drink and drive no matter what.
 
−
:;Rebuttal
 
−
:: Complete eradication of drunk driving is not the expected outcome. The goal is reduction.
 
  
−
;Posit (fallacious)
+
[[Catégorie:English]]
−
:[[Seat belt]]s are a bad idea. People are still going to die in car crashes.
+
[[Catégorie:Etat]]
−
:;Rebuttal
+
[[Catégorie:Traduction]]
−
::While seat belts cannot make driving 100% safe, they do reduce one's likelihood of dying in a car crash.
 
  
−
;Posit (fallacious)
+
<addthis />
−
:The [[Umpire Decision Review System]] (in [[cricket]]) is a bad idea. It can't fix all missed calls.
+
<html></div></html>
−
:;Rebuttal
 
−
::While not all umpiring errors are corrected under the UDRS, it does reduce the number of errors made.
 

Version du 28 septembre 2015 à 11:20

<addthis />


Encore un article de http://en.wikipedia.org sans équivalent dans http://fr.wikipedia.org

Epinglé ici en tant qu'outil classique de rhétorique gauchiste.

Aucune amélioration politique bottom-up n'est recevable puisqu'elle sera infiniment inférieure à la solution parfaite/nirvanesque top-down construite par l'état parfait/nirvanesque et ses agents parfaits/nirvanesques.

«Tout dans l'état, rien contre l'état, rien en dehors de l'état.» - Mussolini, discours à la ch des députés, 26 mai 1927 fascisme


Le début de l'article

The nirvana fallacy is a name given to the informal fallacy of comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives. It can also refer to the tendency to assume that there is a perfect solution to a particular problem. A closely related concept is the perfect solution fallacy.

By creating a false dichotomy that presents one option which is obviously advantageous—while at the same time being completely implausible—a person using the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. Under this fallacy, the choice is not between real world solutions; it is, rather, a choice between one realistic achievable possibility and another unrealistic solution that could in some way be "better".


<addthis />

Récupérée de « https://uplib.fr/w/index.php?title=Nirvana_fallacy&oldid=11884 »