Nirvana fallacy : Différence entre versions
| Ligne 24 : | Ligne 24 : | ||
==Le début de l'article== | ==Le début de l'article== | ||
| − | The '''nirvana fallacy''' is a name given to the | + | The '''nirvana fallacy''' is a name given to the <b>informal fallacy</b> of comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives. It can also refer to the tendency to assume that there is a perfect solution to a particular problem. A closely related concept is the '''perfect solution fallacy'''. |
| − | By creating a | + | By creating a <b>false dichotomy</b> that presents one option which is obviously advantageous—while at the same time being completely implausible—a person using the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. Under this fallacy, the choice is not between real world solutions; it is, rather, a choice between one realistic achievable possibility and another unrealistic solution that could in some way be "better". |
<br> | <br> | ||
Version du 28 septembre 2015 à 11:21
Encore un article de http://en.wikipedia.org sans équivalent dans http://fr.wikipedia.org
Epinglé ici en tant qu'outil classique de rhétorique gauchiste.
Aucune amélioration politique bottom-up n'est recevable puisqu'elle sera infiniment inférieure à la solution parfaite/nirvanesque top-down construite par l'état parfait/nirvanesque et ses agents parfaits/nirvanesques.
«Tout dans l'état, rien contre l'état, rien en dehors de l'état.» - Mussolini, discours à la ch des députés, 26 mai 1927 fascisme
Le début de l'article
The nirvana fallacy is a name given to the informal fallacy of comparing actual things with unrealistic, idealized alternatives. It can also refer to the tendency to assume that there is a perfect solution to a particular problem. A closely related concept is the perfect solution fallacy.
By creating a false dichotomy that presents one option which is obviously advantageous—while at the same time being completely implausible—a person using the nirvana fallacy can attack any opposing idea because it is imperfect. Under this fallacy, the choice is not between real world solutions; it is, rather, a choice between one realistic achievable possibility and another unrealistic solution that could in some way be "better".
<addthis />
